|   |  |   
  
    
      |  |  | Prioritizing
        Linguistic Robustnessby Mad Dog
 
 
 |  
      | Politicians talk
        about regime change when they really mean overthrow a government and
        refer to friendly fire as if there can ever be something warm and
        welcoming about a chunk of lead embedding itself into your body
 |  | They say English is one of
        the most difficult languages to learn. Of course “They” are usually
        Americans who are trying to learn another language and need an ego boost
        because they can’t tell their hola from an olé or say merci
        when they should be asking for mercy because they’re mutilating
        someone’s native tongue. Sure English is tricky, what with words that
        are spelled alike but pronounced differently, such as though, through,
        and tough, and words which are spelled identically but have different
        meanings, which doesn’t begin to explain why the present is such a
        good time to present a present. But what really makes the language
        difficult is that people don’t say what they mean.    When I was growing up I made a sign
        and hung it on the wall above my desk. It said: Eschew obfuscation. Of
        course I didn’t come up with this on my own—hey, I was in fifth
        grade and had to look it up exactly like you just did—but I
        appreciated its irony. And yes, I did know what irony was back then,
        even though sarcasm was my stock in trade, which helps explain why I
        spent so much of my youth in my room alone without dinner, having
        nothing to do but look at that sign over my desk. If I had it to do over
        again, trust me, I’d put a Playboy centerfold on the wall instead.    Apparently people don’t like to
        eschew obfuscation. Or maybe it’s that they prefer to eschew having
        anyone know what they’re really thinking. Politicians talk about
        regime change when they really mean overthrow a government, refer to
        friendly fire as if there can ever be something warm and welcoming about
        a chunk of lead embedding itself into your body, and enjoy using words
        like “untidy” to describe looting and anarchy in Iraq. Business
        people are just as bad. They synergize when they could combine, downsize
        rather than fire people, and like being on the same page, even when
        there isn’t a piece of paper in sight.
 
 |  
      | It may mean he
        intends to have the city give out nice prizes if you buy a home. Other
        than your property tax bill, that is. Who knows, maybe you’ll even be
        able to get a consolation prize if your bid isn’t accepted.
 |  | Combine business and politics and you have a real problem. Gavin
        Newsom, a run-off candidate for mayor of San Francisco who has
        experience in both business and politics—a plus in some people’s
        book, a double whammy in other’s—was quoted during the campaign as
        having promised to speed up the “visualization process” for housing
        construction at the same time he will “incentivize homeownership.”
        I’m not sure if both of these can happen simultaneously or not, since
        I honestly don’t know what either one means.    I suspect the first will entail
        hiring coaches to teach citizens how to sit in the lotus position and
        conjure up mental images of front-loaders, carpenters, and trucks full
        of drywall, to be followed by the distribution of bumper stickers that
        read: “Visualize World Housing Construction.” The second may mean he
        intends to have the city give out nice prizes if you buy a home. Other
        than your property tax bill, that is. Who knows, maybe you’ll even be
        able to get a consolation prize if your bid isn’t accepted. Hopefully
        they’ll hire Carol Merrill to show us what we might win. That would
        make it fun, and it’s about time someone injected fun into home
        buying.
 
 |  
      | In other words, English isn’t the hardest language to
        learn, though it may be the hardest to use without forcing the listener
        to envisioneer and leverage a newly repurposed and value-added paradigm
        shift.
 |  | The question is, how can we clear up this grammatical
        obfuscation? Don’t look to the schools to help—children don’t
        study English anymore, they take classes in Language Arts. Whatever that
        means. Fortunately they do know how to use computers, so maybe the
        Bullfighter software put out by Deloitte Consulting
        (www.dc.com/bullfighter) will help. This is a free program much like a
        spellchecker which reads your document and flags 350 “bull words,”
        including leverage, utilize, re-engineer, and seeing red. Just kidding
        about the last one. Even though it’s actually about bulls, it’s okay
        to say it. I think Bullfighter is a great idea and hope that it’s a
        robust program so you’ll be able to prioritize your disintermediation.
        And trust me, there’s nothing worse than unprioritized
        disintermediation. Except, of course, being hit by friendly fire.    We might also try using more of our
        brain when we speak. You know, like the Chinese do. Sophie Scott, a
        psychologist at England’s Wellcome Trust (motto: “We spell gud.”),
        discovered that when people speak English they use the left side of
        their brain’s temporal lobe, while native-speaking Chinese use both
        sides. In case you were resting your entire brain during that particular
        environmental science class—I mean, biology class—the left side of
        the temporal lobe controls piecing sounds into words while the right
        controls President Bush. Just kidding. Actually it’s the far right
        that controls him. But that’s irrelevant since everyone knows politics
        has nothing to do with using the brain.    Scott says this means Chinese is more
        difficult to understand and speak than English. In other words, English
        isn’t the hardest language to learn, though it may be the hardest to
        use without forcing the listener to envisioneer and leverage a newly
        repurposed and value-added paradigm shift. Excuse me while I chew on
        that obfuscation. ©2003 Mad Dog
        Productions, Inc. All Rights Reserved.These columns appear in better newspapers across the country.
        Read them using both sides of your temporal lobe.
  |  
 |